It is actually a really good thing to go and see exam shows/ art fairs. By seeing so much stuff, by so many young and promising people it is easier to discern trend from art - within the art that I see and in my own head (ie preferences).
It is a discussion I've had with myself. Sometimes I realise after a while that the piece of work that I liked half a year ago, suddenly has a reflection in the latest fashion from the big chain stores, in shoes and graphic design and design and so forth. This is annoying because it questions whether I liked the art because of the art or because Im brainwashed and trend sensitive. Obviously, what I am saying here is that for me there is a problem when an art piece is too trendy - in its aesthetic or approach.
Why?
Perhaps because it becomes design for me. It becomes designed decorative objects or images made, not by someone dwelling deep in introspection or on the matters of the world, but someone also sensitive to trends, a maker of objects that fit those trends, a designer. And I don't think design and art are the same or should be mixed up (even if there always will be a neat grey area where these two fields can conflict and question each other - and THIS is good).
So, there are a couple of trends that are very obvious through the displayed works. I hope I was more of an art or pop-culture historian because unfortunately I can't break down these styles, my analysis will be shallow. Basically I can see that a lot of people are doing quite similar stuff, using a similar aesthetics, and that this aesthetic also is represented somehow in todays fashion (and then I mean TODAY, cause now everything is supposed to change with like a 2-month interval) and design.
TREND 1:
James Turell-like light-colour-scales ie like neon pink, light neon turqoise-green, light blue, orange, yellow/ pastels/ minimal pop - Triangles, pyramids, deserts, palmtrees, Illuminati, NASA, space, stars, moons, satellites, diamonds, rainbows, unicorns, waterfalls, glitter, roadkill.
Why these belong in the same grouping I can't really explain - kitch? Its clearly a form of kitch, it is ironic.
Some examples below. Some of these I actually think superseeds the trend and feel independent. especially the video-installation by Tomas Sjögren, Deserted, (see stills below).
TREND 2:
The fragmented body, Body Parts, the body material, skin, hair, flesh, fur, teeth. Small animal-like sculptures, like roadkill (and its interesting, it seems roadkill is the common factor here... thats the sort of extremely peculiar insight that totally makes my day), fleshlike clothing, body clothing, the amorphous body-object, the body-mechanic-machine.
WHAT SWEEPS YOU AWAY IS THE FORCE OF DESIRE; WHAT CALLS YOU IS DEATH. Baudrillard, Fatal Strategies
Cool artists
Stockholm
Exhibitions
Notes
Texts
POLITIK/ J's tankesmedja
Articles
IRONY
New York
Tallinn
Books
Houston
Party
CLOUDS
Olafur Eliasson
Performance
Adam Jeppesen
Adela Andrea
Andreas Albrectsen
Ann Eringstam
Carl Kostyal
Cecile B Evans
Chantal Mouffe
Dana Bubacova
Denise Grunstein
Drawing
Eduardo Terrazas
Emma Fredriksson
Eric Bidner
Eric Manigaud
Erno Enkenberg
Ian McKeever
James Copeland
Jason Martin
John Copeland
Karel Koplimet
Magnus Svensson
Malevitj
Marco Cueva
Marika Mäkelä
Mark Bishop
Massimo Vitali
Mika Rottenberg
Music
Mårten Nilsson
Nancy Haynes
Nicholas Chardon
Ninna Helena Olsen
Paula Lehtonen
Pauliina Pietila
Peter Funch
Photography
Rauha Mäkilä
Roland Barthes
Sirja-Liisa Eelma
Social toolbox
Steinar Haga Kristensen
Steve Minatra
Tatjana Valsang
Trine Sondergard
Vanna Bowles
Virgil Cane
Wayne Gilbert
Wes Lang